W682 EXPRESSION PROFILING OF SUGARCANE GENOTYPES CONTRASTING FOR DROUGHT TOLERANCE

Date: Sunday, January 15, 2012
Time: 8:00 AM
Room: Royal Palm Salon 1-2
Antonio Figueira , Universidade de Sao Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
Joao Felipe Nebó , Department of Plant Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL
Silvana Aparecida Creste Dias de Souza , Centro de Cana - Instituto Agronômico, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
Daniel Nunes , Centro de Cana, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
Paulo Marchiori , Centro de Ecofisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
Ricardo S. Machado , Centro de Ecofisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Brazil
Rafael V. Ribeiro , Centro de Ecofisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Brazil
Mariana Belloti , Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Aline Harissis , Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Joni Lima , Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Ray Ming , University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign, Urbana, IL
Glaucia Souza , Institute of Chemistry - University of São Paulo
Marcos G. A. Landell , Centro de Cana, Instituto Agronômico de Campinas, Brazil
Patricia Rezende , Jalles Machado Mill, Goianésia, GO, Brazil
Rogério A. B. Soares , Jalles Machado Mill, Brazil
The Brazilian sugarcane industry is expanding rapidly, particularly to drought-prone regions. We characterized tolerance by phenotyping and attempted to identify genes with roles in drought tolerance. From 100 genotypes, 10 were selected and evaluated for drought tolerance in a field trial in Goianésia and under greenhouse conditions. Based on morphophysiological evaluations, we identified two contrasting genotypes for response to drought stress: ‘IACSP94-2094’ showed enhanced features of drought tolerance (early stomatal closure; maintenance of leaf water potential; and superior photochemical activity), absent in ‘IACSP97-7065’. Leaf samples collected from these contrasting genotypes under irrigation or drought conditions in a field trial at two moments (early and after severe drought) were used to perform microarray analysis. From a set of 14,522 genes, 91 were differentially expressed between irrigated or non-irrigated treatments during early drought, whereas 576 were differentially expressed during severe drought between water treatments, from which 438 were differentially expressed between genotypes. ‘IACSP94-2094’ showed more changes in expression than ‘IACSP97-7065’ in genes from pathways associated with drought tolerance, such as oxidation/reduction, hormone metabolism, response to stress, and response to abiotic stimulus by gene ontology analysis. Leaf samples from the same genotypes grown in the greenhouse under similar treatments were used for gene expression profiling by RNAseq. Using the sugarcane assembled sequences as reference (43,141 genes), we identified 2,300 as differentially expressed. Most of the genes identified by microarrays were also observed in RNAseq, with similar expression levels. Target genes are being used for functional genomics assays to develop new drought-tolerant cultivars.